Teachers from K-12
This is Teacher Appreciation Week, and I've been thinking a lot about the teachers I have had - particularly those who have made a positive difference.
The first teacher I remember being such an influence, was Sister M. Deborah, CSA. I had Sr. Deborah for 3rd and 4th grade, at St. Joseph's - a four room Catholic grade school in Berlin, Wisconsin. Sr. Deborah was young, maybe nineteen or twenty at the time. Word had it that she was pulled out of the convent early because there was a teacher shortage and she had a gift for teaching. I can't verify the first part of that statement, but I can attest to the second part.
Our classroom had approximately 40 students in it - half in third grade and half in fourth grade. Each grade had its own curriculum for reading (4 separate reading groups in each grade!), math, and spelling. We had religion, music, art and physical education all together in one group. Long before the days of experiential education, I remember clearly two things I learned from Sister: that learning was fun, and that if I finished my work before everyone else did, there was always a book from the "library shelves" I could explore. My favorites? The dictionary and the encyclopedia! I learned that in some situations, I was responsible for my own learning.
The second teacher I remember "making a difference" was Sister Mary Patriciana, OP. Sister Mary Patriciana was tiny - even shorter than I was in 8th grade. She was new to St. Dennis Catholic School in Madison, Wisconsin my 8th grade year. St. Dennis was a much larger school - grades 3-8, in a twelve-room school. She was not only the 8th grade teacher, she was also the principal, replacing a much-loved teacher/administrator. Although I'd only been in the school for one year before she came, many of my classmates felt much closer to her predecessor. We weren't particularly nice to her: we were respectful to her face, yes - but not nice. Behind her back, we called her "Mighty Mite."
At that time, I had volunteered to play the organ for weekday mass. I wasn't particularly good - I could pick out a song on a piano keyboard, but not much more than that. But we didn't have an organist and I was raised to volunteer to help when I could. For reasons I won't go into, the parish priest chose to make negative comments about my "playing." One day, he was particularly cruel in scolding me in front of the congregation. After I finished playing that specific song, I closed the organ (without being told we were done) and tried to hide my tears. Sr. Mary Pat came up to me, put her arm around me, and pulled me into a less public corner as I cried. She wiped my tears and then said words I never thought I'd hear from a Catholic Sister: "Father was wrong to speak to you that way. He should not have been mean to you. He was wrong." With her support, I found it possible to walk into my class composed and not respond to my classmates' curiosity.
What I learned from Sister Mary Pat was that people in authority are not always right, and that no one has the right to humiliate someone else. That was a brave message to teach me, back in those pre-questioning days. She must have said something to the priest because he stopped picking on me in class as well.
I had some good teachers at Edgewood High School in Madison, too - Sister Alfred Marie, SND, who taught 9th grade World History and was absolutely fanatical about how to write a research paper. The first day of class, she informed us that our semester exam would be a research paper entitled, "The Causes and Effects of the French Revolution." When we all panicked - she reassured us that she would teach us how to take notes, organize materials from multiple sources, make proper citations, and write a research paper. She kept her word. From Sister Alfred Marie, I learned that structure and organization have a critical role in education.
Sister Tobias, SND, taught Spanish, through immersion. Our first day of class, she explained that would be the last day we could use English in her classroom - and that she would only speak in Spanish from then on. She assured us that we knew more than we thought we did - and that we could figure out the rest from the cues she would give us. I suspect she used a lot of pictures and movements - but we learned. From Sr. Tobias, I learned that sometimes we just need to immerse ourselves completely in a new situation, even before we figure out all the answers.
When I was a sophomore, we moved to Watertown High School. I had a number of good teachers there - but two stick out in my mind: Bruce Wittenwyler and Earl Hennessy.
Mr. Wittenwyler taught 10th grade English - American Lit. He was enthusiastic and asked great questions. Even though we weren't sure it was "relevant," we learned a lot about different eras of writing, how they differed from each other, and how they reflected the times in which they were written. What I remember most about Mr. Witt, however, was how he made a new kid - who joined the class 2nd semester Sophomore year - feel a part of the classroom community. Without making a big deal about it - he just included me and made me feel a part of his classroom community. I was "one of the gang" - a fairly new experience for someone who at that point was attending her fifth school in 10 years.
Mr. Hennessy taught 12th grade Sociology (second semester, Senior year) - and by that time, I really had become "one of the gang." The group of us thought we were really something pretty special - and we discovered early on that we could distract Mr. Hennessy from book work by asking questions about current events. And there were plenty of current events to ask questions about. The Vietnam War was at its height - and some of my classmates would be drafted after graduation. Campus unrest (including in Madison) was at an all-time high - we were just a year after Kent State. We were seeing the effects of the Civil Rights Movement - not only in black/white relationships, but also in the use of some of the nonviolent protests for addressing other issues. Finding an issue was easy - and so was getting Mr. Hennessy to facilitate our discussion of those topics.
We really thought we were quite clever, until one day, when he asked a question during our "diversion" and then cited six of us who were not allowed to respond - "to give someone else a chance to express themselves. Discussion needs to have more than just a few people involved," he told us. From Mr. Hennessy, we learned how to disagree agreeably - how to disagree with someone's idea without attacking the individually personally. The lesson may not have been in the text book, but it was a critical lesson for us to learn as we prepared to take our place in the adult world.
So those were some of the educators in my life who made a difference. There were others during those twelve years, but these six were remarkable. The lessons I learned were not included in any curriculum, but they were life-lessons which helped shape the person (and teacher) I've become.
Thank you, Sister Deborah and Sister Mary Pat, Sister Alfred Marie and Sister Tobias, Mr. Witt and Mr. Hennessy. You made a difference.
Thursday, May 8, 2014
Thursday, April 17, 2014
In the Image of a God Who Can't Be Seen
The Torah portion for
the intermediate days of Passover is Exodus 33:12-34:26.
In the narrative, these verses occur shortly after our
exodus from Egypt, and after Moses ascends Mount Sinai to receive the two
tablets with the Ten Commandments. While
he is gone, the people become frightened at his absence. They plead with Aaron to make a god for them,
since they didn’t know what had happened to Moses. In response, Aaron tells them to collect
their gold, which is then melted and used to form the Golden Calf. Moses returns from Mount Sinai, sees what the
people have done and becomes furious with them, smashing the tablets as he
proclaims his anger.
And then he turns to bargain with the Eternal to allow the Israelites to continue to live. “The people have sinned,” he argues, “but forgive them or erase me from the record.” God sends a plague to destroy the sinners and tells Moses to lead the people to the land promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
And then he turns to bargain with the Eternal to allow the Israelites to continue to live. “The people have sinned,” he argues, “but forgive them or erase me from the record.” God sends a plague to destroy the sinners and tells Moses to lead the people to the land promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Moses continues bargaining with
God. “Let me see Your face,” Moses begs, “You’ve singled me out to do Your work. If You really want me to lead Your people,
let me know Your ways.
God is adamant: “No one can see Me and live – you can tell I am with you by observing My goodness and My compassion.”
Moses persists. God finally relents and tells Moses to stand in a cleft in a rock and God’s hand will protect him as God passes by – and then God will take away the protection of God’s hand and Moses will be able to see God’s back. God repeats, “My face must not be seen.”
God is adamant: “No one can see Me and live – you can tell I am with you by observing My goodness and My compassion.”
Moses persists. God finally relents and tells Moses to stand in a cleft in a rock and God’s hand will protect him as God passes by – and then God will take away the protection of God’s hand and Moses will be able to see God’s back. God repeats, “My face must not be seen.”
As we build a new relationship with someone, it’s typical
for us to try to look beneath the surface to the real essence of the person we
are encountering. We look for all types
of indicators of personality, values, and character. As our relationship deepens, we often gaze
intently into the other’s eyes, in order to glimpse the essence of who they
are. What is it they really want from
us? How do they really want us to be? How far will this relationship go?
We are limited in our understanding of God because of our own
humanity and because our language is incapable of describing the
indescribable. And, like Moses, if we
try to fit God into our understanding – we encounter the same response: “My
face must not be seen.”
And yet, it is a tenet of Judaism that we are all created b’tzelem eloheim (in the image of
God). How is it possible that we are
created in the image of Someone Who cannot be seen?
The Etz Hayim commentary reminds us that “in the words of
the Hatam Sofer, we cannot see God directly.
We can only see the difference that God has made after the fact. We can recognize God’s reality by seeing the
difference God has made in people’s lives.”
Most of us can remember people who have “made a difference”
in our lives – a parent or older relative, a teacher, a colleague, a student we
have taught. We look to our heroes –
people who have made a qualitative difference in the lives of many by the
leadership they demonstrated, the injustices they’ve tried to right, or the
beauty they’ve brought into the lives of countless individuals.
The difference they make, however, is not always readily
apparent in the moment. Many times, it’s
only “after the fact” and upon reflection that we see the impact they’ve had
upon us and others.
Sometimes, we too are privileged to make a difference in the
lives of those we touch. Sometimes those
differences are huge – saving a life; mentoring a student; donating generously
of our time, money and energy to bring tikkun
(repair) to the world.
Other times, we’re unaware that our actions have made a difference – a phone call to a lonely friend, greeting a store clerk with courtesy, reaching over to hold the hand of a person in distress, letting someone else go first in line. None of these actions (or others like them) are necessarily significant, at least to the initiator. But to the recipient, they can truly “make a difference.”
Other times, we’re unaware that our actions have made a difference – a phone call to a lonely friend, greeting a store clerk with courtesy, reaching over to hold the hand of a person in distress, letting someone else go first in line. None of these actions (or others like them) are necessarily significant, at least to the initiator. But to the recipient, they can truly “make a difference.”
By engaging in Godly behavior, we will help others (and
ourselves) recognize God’s reality.
Questions for
Discussion:
- Identify someone who made a difference in your life. Who was that person? What were the circumstances? How did knowing that person make a difference in your life, in your circumstances, or in the person you’ve become? Share your story with someone else.
- Identify a public person who you admire for the difference that he or she made in the lives of others? What values did that person exemplify? What impact is still being felt as a result of her or his actions?
- Think about some of the values that you consider important. What everyday actions can you do to make a difference in someone else’s life?
Published by the Washington Jewish Week on April 17, 2014
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
The Torah of Pete Seeger
With
the death of Pete Seeger earlier this week, I’ve been reading a lot about his
music, his practices, and his commitment to justice/tzedek and repair of the world/tikkun
olam. I’d like to share the
Torah/teachings of Pete Seeger, as I understand them.
I. Say what you believe, regardless of the
consequences. During the “Red Scare”
of the 1950’s, Pete was called to testify before the House Un-American
Activities Committee, and refused to name personal and political
associations on the grounds that this would violate his First
Amendment rights: "I am not going to answer any
questions as to my association, my philosophical or religious beliefs or my
political beliefs, or how I voted in any election, or any of these private
affairs. I think these are very improper questions for any American to be
asked, especially under such compulsion as this.” (Wikipedia). He was indicted and later convicted of
contempt of Congress for refusing to “name names.” The conviction was
ultimately overturned, so he didn’t have to serve any of the 10 years he was
sentenced to. In the meantime, his
mobility was restricted, and he was blacklisted from appearing on television
until the mid-60’s. He was willing to
pay the price for adhering to his First Amendment rights.
II. It’s not enough to “talk the talk,” we must
be willing to “walk the walk.” There
was a solid consistency between the words that Pete sang, and the activism he
engaged in. Starting with his
involvement in the labor movement of the 30’s and 40’s, through his protests
against nuclear proliferation (1950’s), and his work on behalf of the civil
rights movement of the 1960’s, Pete’s presence and his music spoke loudly on
the behalf of the disenfranchised. In
the mid-1960’s, he began his work on environmental education and action, which
continued up until the time of his death.
He was also heavily involved in the Jewish camping movement –
specifically with the Surprise Lake Camp in New York. The Camp’s mission statement says they "provide
a high quality Jewish camping experience where children and young adults will
be safe, have fun, and grow as they engage in programs and activities that
enable them to learn values and skills that will help them lead
fulfilling lives and be assets to their communities."
[emphasis added]
III. When one problem is “solved,” move on to
the next. We have not yet reached
the point where we’ve brought repair to the entire world (tikkun olam). By his words
and actions, Pete exemplified the following quote from Pirke Avot (The Wisdom
of the Fathers): "We are not obligated to complete the task, neither are we free to
desist from it." (Pirke Avot, 2:16). Or, put another way – in the language of the
1970’s – “We have to keep on keeping on.”
IV. We must use our gifts to try to bring repair to the world. Pete dreamed of being a journalist and took
courses in journalism and art, taught music, worked as a puppeteer, and an
archivist for the Library of Congress’ Archive of American Folksong. But it was his gift as a singer/performer and
a song writer that changed the landscape of social justice. “We Shall Overcome” has been the anthem of
every group of people protesting for equality for over 50 years. From “The Talking Union Blues” (early 1940’s)
through his performance at Farm Aid in September 2013, Pete used his music and
influence to bring attention to the issues of our times.
V. To bring
repair/tikkun, you must collaborate
with others. And Pete showed by example how critical this
collaboration is. Some of the finest
songs he sang were in conjunction with other noted musicians – the Weavers, Peter Paul and Mary,
Woody Guthrie and – later – Arlo Guthrie. From the Musar Movement, we learn that one
should occupy “no more than my place, no less than my space.” Pete wasn’t afraid to lead… but he also was willing to share the
responsibility for leadership. Which leads to the next bit of teaching…
VI. Involve those who look to you
for leadership. A Pete Seeger concert wasn’t a Pete Seeger concert, unless
the audience sang along at full voice. We
weren’t passive observers, but active participants in this experience.
VII. If
they don’t know the words, coach them!
Pete never assumed people knew the lyrics to his songs. As he encouraged us to sing along, he
reminded us of the lyrics for the next time.
Let’s not be afraid to “coach” each other in this job of working for tzedek/justice.
VIII. We’re
never “too old” to be involved in the work of bringing justice to our
world. As late as 2013, at the age
of 93, Pete was performing on behalf of Farm Aid.
IX. Values are timeless. The values Pete espoused through his music and
the words of his songs are truly timeless – and resonate through the ages. As
our words and actions should be.
X. In the tradition of prophetic Judaism, we
are obligated to speak up when we see wrongs around us. If we don’t, by our silence, we allow them to
perpetuate. His legacy will live in the
words we sing and the actions we complete. As one Facebook poster wrote, “And thank you
for showing us that we ALL have a hammer, a bell, and a song to sing...”
In Pirke Avot 4:13, we read that Rabbi
Shimon said: “There are three crowns--the crown of the Torah [learning], the crown
of the priesthood [service to God], and the crown of royalty [leadership]. But,” said Rabbi Shimon, “the crown of a shem tov/good name surpasses them all.”
Pete
Seeger, of blessed memory, wore the crown of a shem tov.
Thursday, January 2, 2014
A Religion of TIme
Parshat Bo is a familiar one to many of us – it contains a
recounting of the last three plagues before Pharaoh finally tells the
Israelites to leave Egypt immediately.
But there’s an interesting insertion between the ninth and tenth
plagues.
We read: “The LORD
said to Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt: This month shall mark for you the
beginning of the months; it shall be the first of the months of the year for
you.” (12:1-2). And then, even before the Israelites leave Egypt, the
mitzvot associated with the observance of Passover are given. The narrative of
the Exodus resumes at 12:21, with Moses instructing them how to prepare for the
final plague: the death of the first-born of all Egyptian families.
Upon rereading these verses (12:1-20), several questions
came to mind: Why is the first
mitzvah/commandment given the one that deals with the calendar and marking
time? Why is this considered the “first month of the year for you” – what about
Rosh Hashanah? Why are the mitzvot/commandments about how to observe Passover
given before the event occurs?
On the surface, the response to the first question is very
pragmatic: in order to celebrate the exodus on the fifteenth
of the month, one needs to know when the month begins. But perhaps the establishment of a unique
calendar including human responsibility for keeping time (declaring the new
month after witnesses testify their viewing the moon at the Sanhedrin) is less
a technical command and more a spiritual gift.
Rabbi Ari Kahn from Aish added another dimension to the
discussion by saying, “Rav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik, z’l, explained why this commandment
was given here, and now. The Jews in Egypt were slaves, and therefore lacked a
sense of time. They needed to acquire a sense of time in order to be truly
liberated, transformed from objects to independent people.”
It is our ability to delineate time which gives us both the
freedom AND the responsibility to carve out meaningful lives for ourselves.
All joking about “Jewish time” aside, Jewish time is an
interesting phenomenon: it’s both fixed and flexible. It’s fixed in that it’s based on the cycles
of the moon – the waxing and waning that occurs every month on a predictable
pattern. We know when Sukkot, Purim and
Pesach are approaching, by the moon’s increasing fullness. We know when Rosh Hashanah, a new
year, is here – just as we see the new moon. Chanukah’s
end is announced by the sighting of the new moon, as well (plus one!).
It’s flexible in that the days begin and end at different
times, depending on the season and the latitude at which one lives. And we must acknowledge that it’s just
plain confusing to have our days begin at sundown the night before- confusing
only because we spend much of our lives removed from the natural world in which
we live. Our lunar calendar also needs
to be flexible so that our cherished marking of the harvest festivals,
dependent on the solar cycle, will fall on the appropriate seasons. And so we
get that quaint phenomenon of needing to ask if Passover is "early or
late" each year.
Why is this considered the “first month of the year for
you”? Our tradition lists four different “new years” – that of the civil year,
the religious year, the beginning of the tax (tithing) year, and that of the
trees. A number of commentators make the
distinction between Rosh Hashanah as the celebration of creation, which applies
to all; while Passover is the celebration of OUR liberation (think of the difference between
January 1st and July 4th for Americans).
Finally, why are such detailed instructions given for
observing an event which hasn’t even occurred yet? A number of commentators
make the point that the Israelites don’t automatically become a free people
when they leave the land of Egypt.
Rabbi Lucy F.H. Dinner, in the Women’s Torah Commentary,
reminds us that “To be truly free,
individuals need faith in their identity as a free people and in their own
unquestioned autonomy. As much as
liberation is about release from forced servitude, it is also about the
psychological and spiritual strength required to act according to one’s own
will.” Liberation then requires individuals to “act as if” they are
liberated – even if they don’t quite feel it.
The great modern philosopher Abraham
Joshua Heschel reminded us that Judaism is a religion of time, aiming at
the sanctification of time. It
may be a fair contrast to note that the Egyptian civilization enslaved people
to build storehouses, royal cities, and perhaps some pyramids. It was a kingdom of sacred places. The new Israelite nation had to escape the
boundaries of space created by human technology and architecture, and learn to
use what Heschel called "the architecture of time" in which to build
lasting "palaces in time" like Shabbat and the festivals.
We send our children off to conquer the world with a list
of instructions and reminders about those events and activities which are
important to us and, hopefully in time, to them as well. We adults who manage home and office
schedules, the balance between work and rest, know how critical time management
is to our success. And we can see how
time challenged people find it difficult to prepare for, and celebrate with
calm and joy, holiday and life cycle events. So we can surely appreciate the
tradition that notes that the Israelites leave Egypt with a prescription for
how to cope with time for physical and spiritual success in whatever
circumstances they find themselves. It
is a gift worthy of study and transmission to our children and grandchildren.
Published by the Washington Jewish Week, January 2, 2014
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
May His Memory Be For a Blessing
Gregory
Tyrone Walton
His funeral was held today.
Gregory grew up in the
District, attended DC Public Schools and studied Business Management at Federal
City College. As many of our generation did, he joined the Peace Corps,
where he learned masonry.
I met him three years ago, when we opened Gan Shalom, the Jewish Cooperative
Preschool, supported by the Hill Havurah, on Capitol Hill in the District.
We rent space in a rowhouse (aka "town house") owned by the
Capitol Hill Seventh Day Adventist Church. Gregory was a member of the
Church, took care of their grounds and did custodial work for them. He
became our custodian, too... and in the three years we worked together, my
respect for him increased on a regular basis.
Gregory was unique.
To quote a friend of his:
- Gregory was
humble, thoughtful and kind.
- Gregory had a
beautiful singing voice.
- Gregory could
speak French with an awesome French accent.
- Gregory asked
questions when he didn't know something, and introduced himself
if he didn't know someone (or their dog).
- He never had a
bad word to say about anyone and had a smile for EVERYONE.
When I first met him, I
didn't quite know what to make of Gregory - this incredible bundle of energy,
who smiled non-stop, greeted people by name, asked about each of my family
members by name, and ended his conversations with a "God bless you,
Mary." I learned to ask about his family in return, and he always
responded, "They're doing well, Praise the Lord. And thank you for
asking."
This last year was more
difficult for him. He was having some health problems, which he chose not
to discuss. A number of us were worried,
but we respected his right to privacy. This spring, he unexpectedly went into
the hospital. Upon discharge, he called me to let me know that he
wouldn't be able to work for us any longer because of his health problems.
He apologized for inconveniencing us.
Gregory died last Wednesday.
I've been thinking a lot about the impact he had on my life, on our students'
lives, on their families' lives, on the neighborhoods and the communities he
interacted with. In the shadow of the Capitol, where power and influence
often make themselves known, Gregory was truly unique. Today, I stopped my
busy-ness to reflect on that uniqueness.
Here's what I realized:
Gregory was one of the few truly happy people I've known. His
"Praise the Lord"s echoed the joy he found in every-day life: in
cleaning, and mowing, and walking his dogs, riding his bike, and greeting the
people who passed by.
Many of us hold a bit of ourselves in reserve. We learn to hide behind the mask
we wear in public. Gregory wore no mask. He was genuine - the same
person no matter what the setting was.
He taught me to slow down - his sincere questions about how my family members
were doing, which needed to be addressed before we could "talk
business" made me realize that, yes, it really is all
about relationships. And so I learned to listen when he talked, so that I
could reciprocate the lovingkindness he demonstrated.
His attention to detail was shown in the way he salted and sanded the icy metal
steps of the rowhouse - without ever being asked - so we all could climb the
steps safely in our erratic Washington winters. He noticed when the
entry-way throw rug was dirty and - without being asked - saw that it was
washed and returned.
In this day of
politically-correct language, Gregory was an unabashed, absolutely joy-filled
Christian, who proclaimed his faith on a regular basis. And yet, his
acceptance of our Jewish beliefs and practices was unequivocal.
I learned a lot about Gregory today from a number of people in the
filled-Church service - but we all seemed to agree on how our lives had been
changed dramatically - for the good - by this humble man who encountered
everyone as if he could see the spark of the Divine in them.
And I was reminded by something a friend wrote in my yearbook from Edgewood
High School in Madison, Wisconsin, when I was a sophomore:
Our lives are shaped by
those who love us... by those who refuse to love us.
May his memory be for a
blessing.
Gregory
Tyrone Walton
His funeral was held today.
I met him three years ago, when we opened Gan Shalom, the Jewish Cooperative Preschool, supported by the Hill Havurah, on Capitol Hill in the District. We rent space in a rowhouse (aka "town house") owned by the Capitol Hill Seventh Day Adventist Church. Gregory was a member of the Church, took care of their grounds and did custodial work for them. He became our custodian, too... and in the three years we worked together, my respect for him increased on a regular basis.
Gregory was unique.
To quote a friend of his:
Gregory died last Wednesday.
I've been thinking a lot about the impact he had on my life, on our students' lives, on their families' lives, on the neighborhoods and the communities he interacted with. In the shadow of the Capitol, where power and influence often make themselves known, Gregory was truly unique. Today, I stopped my busy-ness to reflect on that uniqueness.
Here's what I realized:
Gregory was one of the few truly happy people I've known. His "Praise the Lord"s echoed the joy he found in every-day life: in cleaning, and mowing, and walking his dogs, riding his bike, and greeting the people who passed by.
Many of us hold a bit of ourselves in reserve. We learn to hide behind the mask we wear in public. Gregory wore no mask. He was genuine - the same person no matter what the setting was.
He taught me to slow down - his sincere questions about how my family members were doing, which needed to be addressed before we could "talk business" made me realize that, yes, it really is all about relationships. And so I learned to listen when he talked, so that I could reciprocate the lovingkindness he demonstrated.
His attention to detail was shown in the way he salted and sanded the icy metal steps of the rowhouse - without ever being asked - so we all could climb the steps safely in our erratic Washington winters. He noticed when the entry-way throw rug was dirty and - without being asked - saw that it was washed and returned.
I learned a lot about Gregory today from a number of people in the filled-Church service - but we all seemed to agree on how our lives had been changed dramatically - for the good - by this humble man who encountered everyone as if he could see the spark of the Divine in them.
And I was reminded by something a friend wrote in my yearbook from Edgewood High School in Madison, Wisconsin, when I was a sophomore:
Thursday, June 13, 2013
And so a Journey Ends
Today I retired from my job as the founding Director/Teacher
at Gan Shalom Cooperative Preschool in Washington, DC – the latest in my career
as a Jewish educator and/or administrator at several Jewish institutions in the
greater Washington DC area.
I fell into Jewish education almost as an accident.
Over twenty years ago, after thoughtful consideration and a
great deal of angst, we made the decision to remove our children from the
religious school they were enrolled in. I
would homeschool them in Judaism while we searched for a school that would be a
better fit for all of us. It was
springtime, right after Purim, and I scrambled to pull materials together for
the rest of the academic year. I discovered the Teacher Resource Center at what
was then called the Board of Jewish Education and began my week each Monday
morning by looking through their files and planning my lessons.
We discovered, my children and I, that some kids learn best
by doing, some by seeing, and some by hearing.
But the most important thing we learned is that learning has to be
relevant.
The Director of the Library/Resource Center was helpful and
encouraging and I was grateful for both.
As a convert to Judaism, I was all too aware of my limitations.
A couple of months after our homeschool venture began, she
offered me a job as a teacher in the religious school she was directing. Ultimately I decided to accept the challenge.
Thus, my journey as a formal Jewish educator began.
Many of the published materials then available were
extremely dated in focus and content. I
began to generate my own materials for my classes – keeping in mind always
those critical lessons my children taught me:
not all kids learn the same and learning has to be relevant.
Fast-forward twenty-three years: I've taught all ages from preschoolers to
adults, directed two religious schools, founded a preschool, written
curriculum, and presented staff development workshops locally, regionally, and
nationally. I established my own Jewish
educational consulting business. I've planned, coordinated, and facilitated
several regional programs for students and for teachers.
My journey as a Jewish educator may have been an accident –
or it may have been b’shert (meant to
be). I still haven’t decided!
As I turned sixty in January, I began to take stock. My commute had become more onerous in the
last couple of years. I could get down
on the floor to play with my students, but found it increasingly difficult to get
back up again! The prospect of expanding the school filled me with fatigue
instead of excitement and creativity. I
began wonder if “it was time:” time to step aside; to focus on personal goals
instead of professional ones.
When I thought about it, I realized I've been working since I
was sixteen: fast food, food service, clerical
worker, administrative assistant, social worker, preschool teacher, religious
school teacher, administrator, and consultant.
As many of us do, I've juggled those responsibilities along with my roles
as full-time mom, and community volunteer.
I began to wonder what it would be like to slow down. It was frightening: so much of who we are is often
defined by what we do.
I talked with people whose opinions I value; I read books on
transitions and self-definition; and I began to look at alternative ways of
self-definition.
And so, today I retired.
I will no longer have the day-in, day-out responsibility for running a Jewish
educational institution, with all that is entailed.
Monday, a new journey begins.
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Passages in the Wilderness
This week's Torah portion is Parashat Chukkat Numbers
19:1-22.1
Passages in
the Wilderness
This week’s parashah –
Chukkat - includes a wealth of
materials. We read of the story of the
red heifer; the disappearance of the well which accompanied the Israelites on
their journey; Moses’ striking the rock for water to pour forth; and the story
of successful military battles. There is
also an introduction to the transition of leadership from the generations of
Israelites who left Egypt to those who arrived in the Promised Land.
In Chapter 20:1 we read, “The Israelites arrived in a body at the wilderness of Zin on the first new moon, and the people stayed at Kadesh. Miriam died there and was buried there.”
Shortly thereafter (Chapter 20:22-29), Aaron dies. We read that the Eternal tells Moses and Aaron that Aaron will be “gathered to his kin” for disobeying His command by striking the rock for water. The sequence is described: Moses and Aaron will ascend Mount Hor; Aaron will be stripped of his vestments which will then be worn by Aaron’s son Eleazar; Aaron will die. When Moses and Eleazar descended from Mount Hor, “the whole community knew that Aaron had breathed his last. All the house of Israel bewailed Aaron thirty days.”
And so the transition to a new generation of leadership begins.
When we study Torah, we are encouraged to notice what is NOT said, as well as what IS said. In this single chapter, there appears to me to be a significant silence.
Miriam died. There is no explanation of why she died or under what circumstances her death occurred, contrary to the later explanation given for Aaron's death. There is no mention of mourning her, unlike the grief expressed upon Aaron’s death. When Miriam dies, Miriam's Well disappears and the Israelites complain that they are dying of thirst.
And so I wonder: were there no tears recorded for Miriam because her death was the first of the leaders' deaths? Or was it because it was easier to focus on the loss of that which she brought (Miriam's Well) than it was to focus on the loss of Miriam herself? Much of our own grief focuses on loss as it impacts on us -- "who will listen to me?", "who will rejoice in my good news?", "how will I keep on going?"
The Women's Torah Commentary suggests the following: Perhaps they were so stunned by the loss of Miriam that they [the Israelites] were unable to express their grief directly. Instead, they cried out against Moses and Aaron, projecting and transferring their grief onto Miriam's brothers. Or perhaps they did not react to Miriam's death in such a way that would give comfort to her brothers. They seem to care only that there was no water, and acted as if Miriam's death were unimportant. We can imagine that Moses and Aaron were deeply shaken by the loss of their sister, and this may have been the reason that Moses reacted with such anger toward the people when he struck the rock, instead of speaking to it, as God has commanded. In grief mixed with rage -- such a normal reaction -- Moses lashed out at the rock to produce what Miriam could have produced with only her presence. (p 300)
As Moses'
big sister, Miriam helped raise him: she protected him and watched over
him. Moses may have felt that he lost
not "just" a sister, but a surrogate mother. Did the Israelites (as a community) also see
her as a surrogate mother?
For Moses and Aaron, Miriam's death makes all too real their own mortality -- in a way that the death of a parent or friend can't. Someone who grew up in their home, someone of their generation, someone who shares their collective memories and growing-up experiences in a way that even a "best friend" can't -- if she has died, so too will they. For all that they have managed to accomplish, they are vulnerable.
And ultimately, after the mourning period, what do we have left? We have our memories and the legacy that gets transmitted from generation to generation. That legacy sometimes comes from the generation that knew the loved one… and sometimes from generations which follow.
When I think of Miriam, I think of courage and joy. That’s due in large measure to the song “Miriam’s Well” by songwriter and singer, Debbie Friedman, of blessed memory. Debbie took a few lines from Exodus, heard what wasn’t said, and provided many of us with a new vision of the character of one of the pivotal women in our history. Without Miriam, Moses would probably not have survived. Or, if he had survived, would not have been linked to his heritage.
And that’s Miriam’s legacy: nurturer, supporter, and joyfilled celebrator.
Questions to consider:1. What legacies have been transmitted to you by your family? How are they transmitted?2. What is the legacy of various communities to which you belong?3. What would you like your legacy to be? What actions are you taking to ensure that legacy will be transmitted?
In Chapter 20:1 we read, “The Israelites arrived in a body at the wilderness of Zin on the first new moon, and the people stayed at Kadesh. Miriam died there and was buried there.”
Shortly thereafter (Chapter 20:22-29), Aaron dies. We read that the Eternal tells Moses and Aaron that Aaron will be “gathered to his kin” for disobeying His command by striking the rock for water. The sequence is described: Moses and Aaron will ascend Mount Hor; Aaron will be stripped of his vestments which will then be worn by Aaron’s son Eleazar; Aaron will die. When Moses and Eleazar descended from Mount Hor, “the whole community knew that Aaron had breathed his last. All the house of Israel bewailed Aaron thirty days.”
And so the transition to a new generation of leadership begins.
When we study Torah, we are encouraged to notice what is NOT said, as well as what IS said. In this single chapter, there appears to me to be a significant silence.
Miriam died. There is no explanation of why she died or under what circumstances her death occurred, contrary to the later explanation given for Aaron's death. There is no mention of mourning her, unlike the grief expressed upon Aaron’s death. When Miriam dies, Miriam's Well disappears and the Israelites complain that they are dying of thirst.
And so I wonder: were there no tears recorded for Miriam because her death was the first of the leaders' deaths? Or was it because it was easier to focus on the loss of that which she brought (Miriam's Well) than it was to focus on the loss of Miriam herself? Much of our own grief focuses on loss as it impacts on us -- "who will listen to me?", "who will rejoice in my good news?", "how will I keep on going?"
The Women's Torah Commentary suggests the following: Perhaps they were so stunned by the loss of Miriam that they [the Israelites] were unable to express their grief directly. Instead, they cried out against Moses and Aaron, projecting and transferring their grief onto Miriam's brothers. Or perhaps they did not react to Miriam's death in such a way that would give comfort to her brothers. They seem to care only that there was no water, and acted as if Miriam's death were unimportant. We can imagine that Moses and Aaron were deeply shaken by the loss of their sister, and this may have been the reason that Moses reacted with such anger toward the people when he struck the rock, instead of speaking to it, as God has commanded. In grief mixed with rage -- such a normal reaction -- Moses lashed out at the rock to produce what Miriam could have produced with only her presence. (p 300)
For Moses and Aaron, Miriam's death makes all too real their own mortality -- in a way that the death of a parent or friend can't. Someone who grew up in their home, someone of their generation, someone who shares their collective memories and growing-up experiences in a way that even a "best friend" can't -- if she has died, so too will they. For all that they have managed to accomplish, they are vulnerable.
And ultimately, after the mourning period, what do we have left? We have our memories and the legacy that gets transmitted from generation to generation. That legacy sometimes comes from the generation that knew the loved one… and sometimes from generations which follow.
When I think of Miriam, I think of courage and joy. That’s due in large measure to the song “Miriam’s Well” by songwriter and singer, Debbie Friedman, of blessed memory. Debbie took a few lines from Exodus, heard what wasn’t said, and provided many of us with a new vision of the character of one of the pivotal women in our history. Without Miriam, Moses would probably not have survived. Or, if he had survived, would not have been linked to his heritage.
And that’s Miriam’s legacy: nurturer, supporter, and joyfilled celebrator.
Questions to consider:1. What legacies have been transmitted to you by your family? How are they transmitted?2. What is the legacy of various communities to which you belong?3. What would you like your legacy to be? What actions are you taking to ensure that legacy will be transmitted?
Mary F. Meyerson is the founder of Morah Mary Consulting, LLC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)